Noodle
Noodle10mo ago

Syntax changes automatically even with "Modify syntax" turned on

If I have "Modify syntax" turned on, that means I want to edit it myself. This is especially annoying because of the fact that you can't reverse the changes, meaning your modifications are gone and you have to make them again from scratch.
13 Replies
absent-sapphire
absent-sapphire10mo ago
@Migaku Extension Support I can replicate. If you alter the Target Word field at all, it seems to regenerate the syntax. @Noodle|🇯🇵 14k thank you for the report. This is really suboptimal behavior sorry you lost your edits
Noodle
NoodleOP10mo ago
It only happened to me a few times haha 😅 . Hope it gets fixed
absent-sapphire
absent-sapphire10mo ago
Ya probably because it's just not often you modify the Target Word in general but ya, we'll get it fixed
stormy-gold
stormy-gold10mo ago
What version of the extension are you using? 🤔 It's strange to me that your target words are bolded with <strong/> tags and not <t/> tags We changed that a while ago And your extension should be auto-updating, unless something else is afoor @Thinh can you log this, the field interactions here are complex and I'm not sure it's as simple as just freezing the syntax field Or maybe it is
Noodle
NoodleOP10mo ago
I've just checked and it's 1.15.4
stormy-gold
stormy-gold10mo ago
That's the right version Very curious! We'll look into it, ty
Noodle
NoodleOP10mo ago
idk, one of my cards got both for some reason, even though I didn't type them in myself lol
No description
Noodle
NoodleOP10mo ago
also not sure how related this is but typing "<p" in the field sometimes makes the field very buggy
provincial-silver
provincial-silver10mo ago
Logged
Noodle
NoodleOP10mo ago
@Saxon when it comes to the <strong> tag problem, I've noticed it happens when I edit the field manually with "Modify syntax" turned off
stormy-gold
stormy-gold10mo ago
Thanks for reporting, we'll add it to our issue log 🙏
provincial-silver
provincial-silver5mo ago
@Noodle|🇯🇵 14k We've implemented a new mechanism for modifying syntax, which should resolve the issue you reported here. Could you confirm if it is fixed?
Noodle
NoodleOP5mo ago
yeah, the first issue and the <p> tag one are resolved, however the <strong> and <t> tag mismatch bug persists

Did you find this page helpful?